Difference between bifacial and monofacial modules

In addition to the structural differences, there is the distinction of durability
Canal Solar Difference between Bifacial and Monofacial Modules
Bifacial modules use cells that are slightly different from those used in conventional modules. Photo: JA Solar/Disclosure

This article was adapted from the original in English published by JA Solar

There are two types of photovoltaic modules: monofacial, which absorb solar radiation only on the front face, and bifacial, which absorb solar radiation on both faces (front and back). Bifacial modules use cells that are slightly different from those used in conventional modules.

While conventional photovoltaic cells have a metallized backside, bifacial cells have a metallization on the backside similar to that used on the frontside – which allows both sides to absorb sunlight. In addition, while conventional (monofacial) modules are coated on the backside with an opaque polymeric sheet (backsheet), bifacial modules can have a transparent plastic sheet or a second glass sheet on the backside.

Figure 1 – Composition of monofacial and bifacial modules. Source: JA Solar

As a result of this difference, bifacial modules are capable of absorbing solar irradiation on both sides (front and rear), as shown in Figure 2 below.

Figure 2 – Absorption of solar irradiation in the modules. Source: JA Solar

In addition to the structural differences, a difference that needs to be addressed between the two types of modules is the issue of durability. Bifacial modules with a glass back generally have a 5-year longer warranty than monofacial modules. Due to the construction difference compared to monofacial modules, bifacial modules with a glass back have a lower risk of microcracks in the photovoltaic cells, since the center of the module suffers less mechanical stress – as illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3 – Mechanical stress thermography. Source: JA Solar.

Another advantage of bifacial modules is the smaller amount of hotspots present in the modules, since the thermal coefficient of glass is greater than that of backsheet, as shown in Figure 4. Furthermore, as a result of this difference, bifacial modules have greater efficiency in places with low ventilation.

Figure 4 – Thermal coefficients of the modules. Source: JA Solar.

Because of these differences, it is possible to see graphically (considering the LID – light-induced degradation – initial 2% and annual power degradation of 0,45% and 0,55 for bifacial and monofacial, respectively) the performance guarantee relationship and degradation between modules as shown in Figure 5, since bifacial modules, Due to the glass on the back, they have greater efficiency and less degradation.

Figure 5 – Comparison between warranty and module degradation. Source: JA Solar.

Another important point is the issue of albedo in bifacial modules. Due to the presence of glass on the back of the module, the reflectance of the irradiation on the ground (indirect light) further influences the gain in energy generation. So, comparing bifacial and monofacial modules of the same power, bifacials have a greater energy generation compared to monofacials. This generation gain is measured by the bifaciality factor (FB), which is mathematically expressed by:

FB = Pmax, rear / Pmax, front

Where:

Pmax,rear: maximum power due to the light received at the back of the module;

Pmax,front: maximum power due to the light received on the front of the module in STC.

Generally, this data is always present in the data sheets of bifacial modules, as exemplified in the table below.

Table: Data of the mono-PERC Half-cell 330-350W bifacial module, model JAM60D10/MB. Source: JA Solar

Last but not least, the modules differ in their fire resistance rating, due to the fact that the back of the bifacial modules has glass instead of the polymer coating. Bifacial modules have a level A rating (better fire resistance), while monofacial modules, because they have backsheet plastic on the back, have a level C rating (basic fire resistance).

Editorial Photo Canal Solar
Redação Canal Solar
Content signed by experts and collaborators of Canal Solar, with technical analysis, practical reflections and experiences from the solar energy sector.

Answers of 2

  1. Friend, you didn't make any consideration as to how far these modules need to be from the ground for them to be efficient. Another thing, in your own example drawing, the sun is in front of the modules, how does that incidence of light come in behind the module?

    1. Good afternoon, Mauricio, how are you? The first consideration is relative, obviously in a roof structure the rear efficiency is minimal, but in a ground structure it can vary according to the type of soil in the system, where the albedo also influences this rear efficiency. And the second consideration, the capture of solar rays from the rear is done indirectly, either by reflecting the solar ray to the ground, or by reflecting the rays that fall on the module and return to the rear, since bifacial modules are covered with glass on the front and back.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Comments should be respectful and contribute to a healthy debate. Offensive comments may be removed. The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the author. Canal Solar.

News from Canal Solar in your Email

Posts

Receive the latest news

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

<
<
Canal Solar
Privacy

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.