Light requests deferral of adjustment to avoid applying tariff reduction

With the end of expensive energy supply contracts, the distributor's energy cost should reduce significantly
Light requests deferral of adjustment to avoid applying tariff reduction
Source: Pixabay

A Light, an energy distributor that serves more than 4,3 million customers in Rio de Janeiro, asked the ANEEL (National Electric Energy Agency) the deferral of amounts that, if applied, will reduce the tariff for Rio de Janeiro consumers by an average of 14% this year. The concessionaire's next tariff adjustment should be concluded on Tuesday (11).

With the end of expensive energy supply contracts, the distributor's energy costs should decrease, which would lead to a reduction in tariffs. However, the concessionaire is asking for the adjustment to be postponed, as this would prevent the consumer from noticing a large fluctuation in the tariff.

A TR Solutions, a technology company specializing in energy tariffs, explains that the deferral is equivalent to a loan that consumers will compulsorily make to the distributor. According to the company's calculations, the value of the deferral is estimated at R$2 billion.

The prospect of an average reduction in tariffs of 14% estimated by the distributor itself is due to the end, in December, of the supply contract with the Norte Fluminense thermoelectric plant (NorteFlu). The UTE was contracted shortly after the energy rationing of 2001, within the PPT (Priority Thermoelectricity Program).

“In the 2024 tariff process, this contract represented just over 21% of the contracted amount, at a price of R$417/MWh, while the average economic price approved by Aneel at the time was R$283/MWh”, explains the Director of Regulation at TR Soluções and one of those responsible for the study, Helder Sousa.

According to TR Soluções, the tariff relief that should benefit Rio de Janeiro consumers this year may be compromised if the ANEEL comply with Light's request. The distributor invoked similarity with the deferral obtained by Copel-D from the regulator in 2024 and, aiming at alleged “cost predictability”, the distributor requested that the adjustment be zero.

“In practice, this is equivalent to consumers lending the company almost R$2 billion. What’s more, there is no set repayment period. If this trend catches on, consumers will start lending money so that distributors do not reduce their rates,” says Sousa.

Seen more broadly, the reduction in Light's tariff would also benefit all Brazilians, helping to mitigate the impact of the input on inflation.

According to TR Soluções, the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro, around 75% of which is served by Light, s for approximately 10% of the share of electricity in the basket that makes up the official inflation, the IPCA.

“In a year in which the inflation target set by the National Monetary Council is 3% and the expectation is that the average variation in tariffs in the country could exceed the target ceiling of 4,5%, renouncing a structural and long-planned tariff reduction raises questions about the reasonableness of the measure, given its impacts on consumers and the country's economy”, highlights the study by TR Soluções.

“Ultimately, Aneel’s decision on Light’s request could call into question the extent to which tariff predictability and its economic impacts are being considered in the sector’s regulation,” warns Sousa.

As for consumers in Rio de Janeiro specifically, both captive and free consumers will benefit if the tariff reduction is applied. This is mainly due to the relevance, in the distributor's costs, of non-technical energy losses (theft), which are valued at the average price of energy purchase contracts and directly impact the Distribution System Usage Tariff (TUSD), paid by all consumers.

Copel example

In last year's tariff process, Copel Distribuição consumers should have seen an average tariff reduction of 3,29%. At the time, the distributor requested a deferral of the adjustment in favor of stability, predictability and equalization of tariffs.

The goal was to mitigate the magnitude of the tariff effects until 2026, taking into the estimates, made by the concessionaire itself, of positive variation in values ​​until then. “In practice, the regulator made Paraná consumers lend R$452 million to Copel-D”, recalls the director of TR Soluções.

 

all the content of Canal Solar is protected by copyright law, and partial or total reproduction of this site in any medium is expressly prohibited. If you are interested in collaborating or reusing part of our material, please us by email: [email protected].

Photo by Wagner Freire
Wagner Freire
Wagner Freire is a journalist graduated from FMU. He worked as a reporter for Jornal da Energia, Canal Energy and Agência Estado. Covering the electricity sector since 2011. Has experience in covering events such as energy auctions, conventions, lectures, fairs, congresses and seminars.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Comments should be respectful and contribute to a healthy debate. Offensive comments may be removed. The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the author. Canal Solar.

News from Canal Solar in your Email

Posts

Receive the latest news

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

<
<
Canal Solar
Privacy

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.